Memes for creation against evolution

Memes that will help you in debate Evolutionists. They are informative, witty, and often funny. Here are just a few examples. They are free to use on the internet, and churches, sermons and other teaching formats. The memes where you see 2 of the same is where one is optimized for the internet (smaller file) and one is not. So the ones that are not paired you may want to check their quality before you display full screen before a crowd on your projection system.

I claim no copyrights to them and they fall under the fair use act.

Sorry, I just noticed the meme just above this has a misspelled word. It’s supposed to be partisan not pastisan.

[download id=”2457″]

The Taylor trail, human and dinosaur foot prints.

The picture below is of the man who found the footprints, Mr. Taylor.

Since then several more pictures have surfaced, including those altered by evolutionists in the attempt to discredit them.

How these foot prints were uncovered, was that the river that runs through Dinosaur Valley State Park, washed away a huge slab of rock because of heavy rains. The size of the slab can bee seen if you look at the edges of the rock that is higher than the actual foot prints. More of the slab was cleared away to show more of the foot prints as shown in the picture below. To stop this from exposing even more human foot prints that evolutionists would have to explain, a “hurt the river law” was passed making it basically illegal to remove anymore of the slab rock to expose more human and dinosaur foot prints.

 

Here are the ones altered to make them look fake. The original picture is first. how you can tell they are all the same picture are 2 things. 1) The measuring string that runs through the dinosaur print is in each one. 2) The shadow in the upper right hand corner is in each one. All of these pictures were cropped out (cut out) of the picture that is 3 pictures above this paragraph.

In this particular instance, some creationists bought into the human footprints being fake. They did not know these pics were altered. At the time the very first picture I have posted was not available. Creation organizations such as AIG (AIG has removed their page on the Taylor trail) and ICR (link) tell their readers not to use this evidence. To bad they allowed the evolutionists to debunk such good evidence so easily. In my opinion, they are to worried about what world thinks, and they are trying to hard to fit in. Point made, atheistic evolution science is never going to accept them or their evidence. Even if they help supposedly debunk it as some have. It should only matter what God thinks. Besides, of science is truly about finding truth regardless of where it leads. Why all the deception to keep the course of so called truth going in one direction only?

My logic about this: Only a deception requires more deception to make it sound believable. Just like a lie requires more lies for the same reason.

Burdick print, the truth about it.

Ever since they were introduced as evidence that debunks evolution. several claims have been made about them being frauds. Even accusations that creationists conspired to carve them and present as evidence. Even one creationist was accused (Carl Baugh) of doing this even though through all the accusations, no witness was ever provided. Then the attempt to further discredit the evidence, altered pictures of the prints were passed around making it seem that even the pictures were not that good. Here are a few examples:


 

 

 

 

 

Etc… But several other human prints were found with dinosaur prints, and evolutionists allowed them to be categorized with the Burdick prints so that they would be considered fake as well. These were prints found in what known as the Taylor trail. And are not separated from the river bed, where they were found, like the Burdick prints were. Here are a few pictures of them.

 

 

 

 

 

One evolutionist went as far as to say: They must have been made by a dinosaur that had human feet.

But why were the Burdick prints so different, and separated from the river bed they were found in? Back during the depression, the government wanted to get the people back to work again. So a government work program was set up that would hire and work anyone willing to do the job. One of the jobs to be done was to cut out slabs of rock from a river bed in Glen Rose Texas, to be shipped off to the American museum. Here are the drawn up planes for removing the slabs from the river bed.

The museums wanted evidence that solely supported evolution. They did not want the slabs that had human foot prints on them. So the workers had to cut off all the human foot prints from the slabs and took them home as souvenirs . And because they were currently not worth anything, the government foreman allowed the workers to keep them. Evolutionists finding out that there were more than one print to combat, came up with the idea to start the rumor that many were “made” by shop keepers as souvenirs to sell to unsuspecting tourist (the very same rumor started to discredit the ica stones).

Side note: Altering the evidence to solely support one theory is conformism. Conformism is not science. And since they have done it here, it brings to question as to where else this was done. I would estimate, in opinion, that it probably fall into the neighborhood of about 30-50% of the evidence has been altered to conform.

But, are they real? Carl Baugh, who purchased one of the prints from someone who knows it’s history, decided to have the print tested, after all the accusations that it was fake. You see a carved foot print out of stone would not have compression evidence of a person with actual weight making the print. It would simply be just a carving. You cannot compress a rock already hardened without breaking it. So to prove the prints were real, they had them sawed in half where the foot made impressions. This way if they were fake, there would be no evidence of compression. If they were real there would be evidence of compression. So here are the pictures of the results.

To claiming that no human could make a foot print that looks like that. Which by the way the creationists took and tested using wet cement which is the same consistency as mud in a river bed. And yes it did look like that when done.

If you don’t believe that it will look this way. go find some gooey mud and step in it.

So even though history shows these are not fake, and creationist met every challenge to prove they were not fake. The evidence was still rejected.  This is because through evolution science is about naturalism and conformism. All evidence that supports the supernatural will “always” be rejected. It’s either their way or no way. Which brings up the question: What are they afraid of, finding God?. Also, a true proven fact with supposed mountains of empirical evidence (evolution) does not need to use deception. Unless it is not what evolutionist claim it to be.