Memes for creation against evolution

Memes that will help you in debate Evolutionists. They are informative, witty, and often funny. Here are just a few examples. They are free to use on the internet, and churches, sermons and other teaching formats. The memes where you see 2 of the same is where one is optimized for the internet (smaller file) and one is not. So the ones that are not paired you may want to check their quality before you display full screen before a crowd on your projection system.

I claim no copyrights to them and they fall under the fair use act.

Sorry, I just noticed the meme just above this has a misspelled word. It’s supposed to be partisan not pastisan.

[download id=”2457″]

Atheists and NPD mental disorder.

Narcissistic personality mental disorder is a common disorder among militant atheists. Here are the symptoms.

DSM-5 criteria for narcissistic personality disorder include these features:

Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance
Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it
Exaggerating your achievements and talents
Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate
Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with equally special people
Requiring constant admiration
Having a sense of entitlement
Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations
Taking advantage of others to get what you want
Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others
Being envious of others and believing others envy you
Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner
Although some features of narcissistic personality disorder may seem like having confidence, it’s not the same. Narcissistic personality disorder crosses the border of healthy confidence into thinking so highly of yourself that you put yourself on a pedestal and value yourself more than you value others.

Creation Memes you can use for debates!

Click on images to see text fully, and for the link to the articles that go with them that you can use. You can also get an idea of what kind of responses you will get from such an article and how to respond to them. If you use the articles make sure you put them in your own words. Unless you are sharing copy and pasting an exact copy is considered parroting from another source which is frowned upon on the internet. It’s one thing if you are quoting or sharing to copy directly. But another when you are not. Not that I have a problem with this but if you are debating and someone actually look up the original source. They will point out that you are using someone Else’s argument because you can’t think for yourself (an atheist tactic). So just change the wording a little (put it how you would say it). ~ Issac

Evolution is a Lie FaceBook page

Evolution is a Lie FaceBook page is where I now post and debate. The posts on this page updates every 24 hours for each FB page listed here. So visit often to get the latest news from several creation ministries in one place. With the ability to also comment and debate. ~ Issac

Is science extremely bias?

Ever wonder why atheists always say:

1) Where is your creation evidence?
2) There is no creation evidence?
3) Get you creation evidence approved of by science?
4) Show us your peer reviews?
etc…

It’s because atheists run and control science. Which means science also has an atheist agenda. This agenda is to disprove God or at least keep the idea at bay. Above is a picture I made up that best explains this. Shows how science works today (bias) to protect the theory (evolution) that best fits the atheist agenda. And shows how science should work (non bias) if science were run with no agenda. It’s quite an eye opener. This is what atheists don’t want you to realize because this totally discredits science and all that they do. That’s because bias is not science and this clearly shows bias in it’s most extreme form exists. How extreme can this bias be?

Do atheist-leftist agendas control science to make non-scientific decisions?

Basically what is being claimed in both instances is that something that has no life (amino acids) is proof of life. While something that has living cells, a heartbeat, etc… is not proof of life. Problem is only one can be right. And if both are wrong it shows that science is more controlled by the agendas and beliefs of those who have absolute power in it and therefore in situations like this science is basically thrown out the door. Below is a audio of this very thing being discussed on the radio.

[pro-player type=”MP3″]https://kgov.s3.amazonaws.com/bel/2012/20120224-BEL040.mp3[/pro-player]

Update: I have a few messages sent to me claiming that science does not promote abortion. Problem is many of the people in positions to influence others say that it is. Here is an example:

Hitler had the same idea to get rid of the imperfect humans (Eugenics, Holocaust) to make sure that the superior race rises of more perfect people. Forget natural selection instead add the murder of unborn children. Maybe selective murder will become a mechanism for evolution as well. Therefore we could abort great minds like Stephen Hawking before they are even born because of their “physical” disability.

Evolution, problems with first life.

Evolution is about conditions that pressure changes, or what can be referred to as life adapting to it’s surroundings. This poses a problem for the first life that forms. The first life that forms is not inheriting any traits from a previous life. Therefore there is not anything to inherit from adapting. Which brings up the question of how the first life was able to form to live, and survive in it’s environment? It’s like saying that it just poofed itself into being ready to take on whatever came it’s way.

1) First life has has to be able to survive in it’s surroundings.
2) It has to be able to ingest food.
3) It has to be able to process the food it ingests.

Saying that the first life just adapts is like saying you could give your pets sulfuric acid for water and they will just adapt. Unless a process mechanism can be identified as to how the first life formed suited to survive, then the only alternative is creation.