Religion has caused more deaths than secular science, or atheism?
I am often told that if it were not for religion, we would not have so much violence in the world. Also that all wars are religious based. And all mass murders are due to religion. So I thought I would set the record straight and give some real numbers, and how the secular atheists and science are currently killing people and most don’t even realize it.
Here are some numbers of secular deaths from past history.
128,168,000 VICTIMS: THE DEKA-MEGAMURDERERS
61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State.
35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill.
20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State.
10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime.
19,178,000 VICTIMS: THE LESSER MEGA-MURDERERS
5,964,000 Murdered: Japan’s Savage Military.
2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State.
1,883,000 Murdered: Turkey’s Genocidal Purges.
1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State.
1,585,000 Murdered: Poland’s Ethnic Cleansing.
1,503,000 Murdered: The Pakistani Cutthroat State.
1,072,000 Murdered: Tito’s Slaughterhouse.
4,145,000 VICTIMS: SUSPECTED MEGAMURDERERS
1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea.
1,417,000 Murdered? Barbarous Mexico.
1,066,000 Murdered? Feudal Russia.
Smokers are mostly secular atheists: Annual deaths due to smoking just in the U.S. is 435,000.
“Reported” deaths due to adverse reactions to medical science prescription drugs: 32,000
Through science weapons to kill are made:
2) Hydrogen bombs.
3) Atomic bombs.
3) Nuclear bombs.
4) Chemical warfare.
Through science, the chemicals that make most bombs are now used to fertilize our crops, pollute or lands and waters. Kill fish, animals. and humans. These same chemicals cause cancer. 569,490 deaths from cancer in 2010. Medical science puts out drugs that are known to cause cancer, and also sudden death. And continue as if killing this way is okay. Is killing in the name of science justified if it’s for research? I mean we are animals, according to them, so killing us in the name of science progression should be just fine. So let’s have science put out an ad to see who will volunteer for such a noble task to willing die for science to gain knowledge?
Medical science, as a whole, is a multi-trillion dollar business. And is why they are not interested in the treatments through HBOT, that some are listed on this page: HBOT video documentaries (link). There is no money for the pharmaceutical companies who run the medical field, so the doctors in the videos have to document their findings on youtube.
Number of abortions per year: Approximately 42 Million
Number of abortions per day: Approximately 115,000
And most who support abortion also would like to have infanticide (killing babies that are born alive even up to several months or years old) legalized.
But the population is to stupid (their logic) to understand why they die (medical drugs) so it’s all done in secret while journals are kept on people who live and die at the hands of medical doctors who want their names printed (not all doctors are this way, but many are) for their “human” experiments. How do you think they find out that a drug has a side effect of sudden death, or cancer unless it was tested on a human subject that this happened to? Do you see them saying: some rats died so you might also? Or No actual humans did…. And as long as they say this as a warning (the side effects), you can die from it and your family cannot sue them for it. We told you, so that leaves us not liable. This logic is like saying that printing on guns that guns can kill, then you go out and murder someone and that makes it okay. Killing by drugs or guns is no different. A dead person at the hands of another is the result.
So is killing in the name of science justified?
Example: Guns can kill. Everyone knows this. So when you buy a gun you are taking that knowledge of what it can do with you. And if you kill someone with that gun and it was not self defense, insanity is about the only thing that will get you off. But let’s take drugs for instance. The doctor writes you a prescription for a drug he “knows” can kill you (he has foreknowledge of possible death just like the person with the gun). You later have a bad reaction and die. The difference between the one who shot someone and the doctor, is that only one did it in the name of science. Only one went to school to learn how to do this, and was taught science.