Evolution's hall of shame.

Piltdown Man: The Fossil Remains
Piltdown Man consisted of two human skulls, an orangutan jaw, an elephant molar, a hippopotamus tooth, and a canine tooth from a chimpanzee. Sir Kenneth Oakley has determined the human skulls to be approximately 620 years old. They may have belonged to Ona Indians from Patagonia, as the skulls were unusually thick. Thick skulls are a common trait among Ona Indians. The orangutan jaw is around 500 years old, perhaps from Sarawak. The elephant molar is thought to be from Tunisia. The hippopotamus tooth is thought to have come from Malta or perhaps Sicily. The canine tooth belonged to a Pleistocene Chimpanzee. The Piltdown remains were purposefully scattered around a quarry in Piltdown, England, so that they could be "discovered" later as evidence for evolution and the development of man from ape. The skulls had been treated with acid. All of the fossil remains were stained with an iron sulfate solution. The canine tooth was painted brown and patched with bubble gum. The molars were filed down. The portion of the orangutan jaw that connected the jaw to its skull was carefully broken so as not to show evidence that this jaw did not belong to a human skull.

Piltdown Man: The Perpetrators
The Piltdown Man hoax is thought to have been perpetrated by Charles Dawson, an archaeologist, geologist and fossil collector for the British Museum. However, no one is quite certain who was involved. There are a number of other suspects, including Sir Arthur Smith Woodward, Keeper of the British Museum's Natural History department, and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a paleontologist and Jesuit theologian.

Piltdown Man: A Deliberate Hoax
Piltdown Man was obviously a deliberate hoax. Upon critical investigation, the hoax was exposed very quickly. However, the "find" was not investigated properly until forty-years after the initial "discovery". This was due primarily to the excellent credentials held by the men who made the "discovery." Very few experts ever suspected fraud. It wasn't until 1949, when the fossils were dated using the fluorine absorption technique, that the authenticity of the "discovery" was called into question. It is true that the fluorine test was not developed until many years after the hoax. However, the file marks upon the teeth, and the fact that the "wear" was backward, would have been immediately obvious upon any inspection from the very beginning.

YEAR	OBJECT	FINDER
1908	Left cranial bone	Dawson
1911	Part of the forehead and back skull	Dawson
1912	Back of skull, right lower jaw (half)	Smith Woodward
1913	Two nasal bones and a canine	Dawson
1915	Fragments of skull and molar (1-1/2 miles from site)	Dawson Teilhard de Chardin

Here's a pic that illustrates what was done to this skull to push this lie.

Left side and down: Fragments of human skull, fabricated from plaster, fragments from a chimp jaw.

Right side and down: Human skull piece, human skull fragment, fabricated from plaster, chimp teeth, fabricated from plaster.

If someone can't tell this skull has been tampered with, they need glasses!

Here are even some fake Pelt Tools. These were made from ivory. There are many more tools made for piltdown man. There was great effort in trying to pass this off as truth.

Here are some scientists examining the skull. Dawson is standing in front of the picture on the wall.

Do you think this room full of scientist were trying to see if we are gullible enough to be fooled by this? Or were they laughing right after this picture was taken? Thinking: What fools we have made of man, to make man believe in this just because we decided not to believe in God. Well, you can't blame me for having an imagination.

In every picture of evolution of man, notice the lower sub-humans, are always dark skinned. Even though, evolution of man has never been observed. Then notice on every picture scale of the evolution of man, white man is what you become at the top. Here again, racism being the mindset of that time that Darwin came up with evolution.