Evolution's hall of shame.
The mutation of roaches.
Evolutionists like to use the argument about roaches becoming immune to roach spray as an observable mutation. What actually happens is: When you spray a roach and it happens to survive and have babies. The babies will be immune to roach spray. So if mutations are so easy for lower life forms, then why has not a roach evolved into a higher life form? For if becoming immune like this happened for all, we humans would never get sick, or have any disease. But we do.
Example: If a woman has cancer, and survives it and has a child. Will the child be immune to that cancer? I don't think so. In fact, studies show that the child maybe more likely to get cancer just because his mother had it.
But being able to mutate the immune system like the roach does, would be desirable. Being that we humans are above the roach, but the roach can do what we can't. Shows even more that there is a design behind life origins. So a lie that would be used to support evolution actually supports creation that was designed by a Creator.
