Home
SinnersPrayer
Online Bible
About site
What's new?
Site Map
Theistic evolution
Earth
Flat Earth
Godtube
Youtube
Creation in detail.
Fast evolution?
Evolution Religion
E vs C Forum
Shame part 1
Shame part 2
Shame part 3
YEC vs. YEC
KentHovind
DeepSpace
Flood
OEC attacks YEC
Study
Red Sea Crossing
Sodom and Gomorrah
H. Body
Hell
last call
Rapture
9-11
Links
Osas
Debate
Bible online 2
Global warming vs Evo
e-mail me

Evolutionist's hate.


                                     Enough is Enough!

Well that's about all the hate I can stand to deal with. I actually feel numb after doing this section of my site. And also saddened because of how all these people think exactly the same. What do all these sites have in common?

 1) They all are fighting what they claim does not exist.
 2) 95% of them imply such extreme hate for all Christians that refuse to think like them, they either "imply" to kill them, or actually come out and say it.
 3) Over 90% of their sites and forums are dedicated to this cause of fighting things they cannot see (spooky).
 4) They believe cussing makes you a more manly person, even though some of them are girly men (as Arnold S. would call them).
 5) They all claim they are the smartest in the world, and anyone who can't see this are stupid.
 6) They call themselves free-thinkers. But only if you think as they do.
 7) They all claim there is no God because evolution proves it. But yet science itself cannot prove God either way. So some how they have a special knowledge that goes beyond science (sounds like foil cap time).
 8) They claim that the Christian past is the only past that has death and murder in it. When their past of what they believe connects to certain types like Hitler.
 9) They all put up special sections on their websites and forums showing how every can join them in their fight against something they cannot see, and claim does not exist. So I wonder, do they spend their time thinking about how to fight thin air?
 10) All of the websites promote degrading of anyone who would dare think differently they they do. Having to resort to this shows how weak their argument really is.
 11) They all say that Christians are all liars, and what they believe are myths. As if they have cornered the idea of what truth is. As if a lie is only something they disagree with. And truth is what they agree with.
 12) They all mock God through words, or graphics.
 13) They all have some sort of plans of attack on the Christian faith.
 14) They all mis-quote past history in one form or another. And call you a liar if you point it out.
 15) etc... (never ending).

So let us deal with the most common claim that they all make: There is no God.

No God, and no creation means we have no soul to be saved. Evolution denies the soul of man because evolution cannot answer the question: In the evolution process, when did man receive a soul that needed to be saved? So those of you that believe one can coexist with the other are actually believing in a oxymoron. Which makes your faith an oxymoron. So you are either a theist, atheist, or agnostic. A theistic evolutionist does not apply, it is only a justification for not wanting to believe God fully, but make everyone think that you do. Is God a fool? I think not, and that will be made clear one day.

A test for a man's soul?

Science cannot prove God either way. But can science prove the existence of a soul? This is where the subject of a life force (soul) comes in. If all that were to life was dead matter that is now living. Fixing what is wrong with that matter to sustain life would be much easier. But yet everyday in the medical field the unexplained happens.

People die, who should have lived. And people live, who should have died. The only explanation medical science has for this is one person's will to live was greater then the others. To come to this conclusion, you would also have to say that anyone who wants to live forever could do just that. But that is not what we see is it?

So we could conclude that when this life force leaves the living matter body, it turns back into dead matter and cannot be revived. Because matter can be repaired. Making the soul return to the body so that life can be sustained, is not obtainable. Therefore medical science will always have a problem explaining how some people died, and some people lived. But, is there evidence that a soul actually exists?

There were some tests conducted on terminal patients to see if the soul actually has weight that could be recorded at the exact time of death (if there was a soul that left, and had measurable weight). Doing this test, they found some interesting stuff. Regardless of how big or small the person was that died, the weight loss was always the same: 3/4 of an once. And it was always recorded right at the instant the person ceased to show any life signs.

Further tests were frowned upon because it was raising some eye-brows on being in-humane, even though consent was obtained from each person to do this.

http://www.snopes.com/religion/soulweight.asp

http://www.homestead.com/WinterSteel/Soul.html

http://216.247.205.102/weighsoul.html

They even did some tests on some dogs to see if all life had this same weight loss upon time of death. The dogs did not experience any weight loss at the time of death. And the bible never says that animals have a soul. Or that a soul was breathed into them. Humans having a soul means that the soul has to go some where when we die. This is the part that atheist do not like to hear. And because evolution denies the existence of a soul, they will hate anything that either condirms there is a soul. Or even says there is a soul.

Click next to continue...


[ First ] [ Prev ] [ Next ] [ Last ]