Science says the early earth was very volcanic like the picture above. Seeing what a 1 F degree change will do to our weather first hand, I believe they should re-think this stance.
Green House Gases:
Some greenhouse gases occur naturally in the atmosphere, while others result from human activities. Naturally occurring greenhouse gases include water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone. Certain human activities, however, add to the levels of most of these naturally occurring gases:
Carbon dioxide is released to the atmosphere when solid waste, fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), and wood and wood products are burned. Volcanic activity also releases these gases in a much greater amount.
And according to what science claims about the early earth. It was a place where eruptions were the norm. So the early earth would have a huge problem with green house gases as well as volcanic ash. The temp. would either be way to hot, or way to cold to support life as we know it. And as we have seen with this year's hurricane season. The earth cannot change to much without life being threatened just like it already has. So if the early earth's atmosphere was much worse than what we have now. Storms must have lasted year round. Which would kill almost all life, if any existed to what science claims, so many years ago. Being that life was just beginning, as science claims, there would not have been much of it. So to kill what was there through storms etc.... Would have stopped the evolution of life all together.
lk 19:40 And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.
Are the stones (rocks) crying out proclaiming God's creation?
The intense heat of a volcano erupting can cause it's own weather. Here we see where lightening is created by a eruption. If the old earth were covered with erupting volcanoes, it does not sound like a place that would be suitable for life to evolve of any kind. Constant storms, rain, wind, lightening, a combination for life? I don't think so. Here's something to ponder. If the atmosphere of the earth were created by these violent eruptions, how did life come to be in the primordial soup? The soup would be highly toxic from the ash and gas mix from these eruptions. The rain would be of no help because it would only wash these toxic chemicals from the land right into the water. Making the water even more toxic to life. So my question would be: How did the oceans and water clean itself to the point where life could actually form when it was being bombarded by toxic chemicals over billions of years?
In fact, the volcanic ash that ended up in the oceans from the billions or even millions of years of erupting, should have settle down to the bottom of the ocean. And because of the many years of the ocean being filled with this ash, there should be a big thick layer of it that we could find. But guess what? There is none.
But the scientists will try and tell you that sea floor spreading, which is a theory of the sea floor recycling itself, has made all this volcanic ash disappear. Problem is, do they really know just how much volcanic ash is involved? On the next page I give just a small taste of just how much ash is released in a volcanic eruption. Once you see this, you will know that the sea floor could never recycle itself enough to remove all the ash from all the volcanic eruptions that science claims happened. It would be like telling an ant to push your car up hill, because you ran out of gas. It's not going to happen.
The sea floor expansion theory (not proven), supports the continental drift theory (not proven). And all this adds up to a earth that is supposetly, expanding. What is not told, is that the size of the earth itself is important to the life that exist on it.
The sea floor spreading also deals with the polar flip theory. Which you can read about here. It's about halfway down that page.
Make sure to click next to continue.
