Redefining truth so that evolution can work.                The struggle for the minds of men. I run into people all the time stating that theories are truth, or that this theory, or that theory has been proven(has to be truth if proven, not a theory anymore). Where did the word truth go in Science? In redefining truth did actual truth get lost? If you ever ask someone about science and truth you'll get a long lecture on what truth is. And if you ask someone about science ever being wrong and having to change things because of being wrong, then they respond: that's what theories are for. To work towards truth. But what happened to the other theory? I thought that was truth? Then I was told: That was truth until proven wrong. HUH? Beginning to sound like science has it own language and definitions of words. Then I started to understand something as I was listening to all the talk and arguments. To push a half truth, or a fable as being true, you need to redefine what truth is. Then sell it to the masses. A type of brain washing I would call it. Give this new way of thinking some big names never heard of before, and then back it up with the smartest minds. Yes, so and so believes that, and so do, so many more. Impress us to sell us even more on the idea. Almost sounds like we're being sold a car or a house. So then as they come up with more half truths or fables, more big names and definitions have to be thought up. Because science is so smart, everything they do constitutes a new word or definition of that word. First came "guess"(common word), which in my opinion is all that's done in most cases. Then came "hypothesis" (another word for guess). Then came "theory" (a more scientific word for guess). Then came a "working mechanism" (something to support the guess). Then came "scientific theory" (When the guess, and the guess support, come together) which is backed up by the working mechanism. The scientific theory is the holy grail in the science world. It is truth and you'd better not mess with "our truth". A whole new belief in what truth is and what it stands for is born. But where did absolute truth go? In the science world, it don't exist. Only variations of it. This is why God's word is so often attacked by those who believe in science. God's word brings back what absolute truth is and what it stands for. God stands for what is absolute truth. And this threatens the whole foundation that science is supported on. This is also why creation is always said to be not science. Because if you start poking absolute truth where there is little to be found, then the untruth starts to crumble. The science community labels Creation as a lie, a fable and not scientific. But when you type in creation and evolution in any search engine, there's always a debate on science forums. If creation is not science then why the debate? Why all the websites stating it's all a lie? If creation was not a true threat to the foundation of science, science would not be wasting their time debating these issues. Some people ask me: why do you debate this when it's not science? My reply: I did not make it science. Science started attacking the word of God and creation. So you think a Christian is not going to defend God's word from this attack? Science has brought, what they say they don't want, upon themselves. I did not have the urge to put up a website on creation until I saw how it was being attacked. God's very own words (Genesis) listed on websites that claim evolution and billions of years old earth. What did they expect? No response? God's word was here before evolution, big bang, gap theory, old earth theory etc... And this fact, science cannot deny. For it can be proven through out history. But what, all of a sudden, made it a lie? When science deemed it as so (and they wonder why science itself is being questioned by Christians). All these fables about God's word being lost, the lost books, the translations messing up God's word, God's word written by man etc... etc.... And this is all they have? If you are to believe what is already a half truth, then the rest is easy. But if you believe in the word of God, then the rest is not easy. For you will be called names, made fun of, have your background checked and published for all to see, you'll be called uneducated, a moron that's been brain washed etc...(Christ said: They hated me and they will hate you for my name sake). But the funny thing is, when you know you have the truth, all of what's said really don't matter. I actually chuckle when I'm called names. I've learned not to get mad but to realize that these people are truly deceived and really believe what their saying. And the reason they get mad is because the truth they hold onto so dearly is threaten by anyone who believes in God. God is the enemy, so therefore, so are all His followers, and all that they believe. An example of science brain washing: Teaching kids in elementary school, even before than can read or have a mind mature enough to make their own decisions. Stories are told of dinosaurs that lived billions of years ago. Kids hear this and are automatically willing to believe what they hear. Are not scientists forcing their views on children by doing this? If kids are so smart to make their decisions about these things, then why not tell them God's version also?

Creation vs. chance and accident The Bible says that God created everything you see. Science says that it all happened by chance and accident through some type of explosion. I just got finished watching a video on our solar system and how everything works together like a fine tuned watch. How all the planets are certain sizes, all have their own unique orbit around the sun, Some have atmospheres and some don't, some have several moons and some only have one, how each have their own unique rotation, that some even rotate backwards etc... As I sat there and watched all of this information, along with all that was gathered from probes that were sent to gather information, it occurred to me that if this all happened by an easy method of chance and accident through some type of explosion, their should be an easy formula that would support this easy method of everything falling into place like science claims. But even after all these years of this claim, there's nothing mathematical or scientific about it. So a easy formula, or even a very sophisticated one, can never be worked out. Even if you apply all the laws of science to this chance and accident, none would apply. And if someone says they do, please tell me how? And show me the data that proves it that is governed by these laws of science. Example: Lets say you have the power to place anything you want, anywhere you want in the solar system. There is only one catch. After your done, it all has to work like the solar system we have now. All the planets and their moons have to stay in orbit for billions of years. And the sun has to be a certain strength, for billions of years, so that not to fry the one planet that will support life. Once your done, you cannot correct anything. Why? Because just as our solar system sits right now, it was all a one time event that could not be corrected if it were wrong the first time. Don't think it would be hard? Then why do satellites fall from the sky? Just as a planet can be sucked into the sun, or spin out into space. If your off by just one variable, your whole design is worthless. In others words, there's no room for error. Is it still sounding like a chance and accident type of deal? So here's what you have to work with: 1) You can use any size sun with any strength of gravity and radiation production you want. 2) You can use any size planets, with any gravity you want. 3) You can use any size moons with any gravity and number to orbit any planet you want. 4) You can set any planet any distance from the sun you have chosen. 5) Only one planet can be able to support life, and this also has to be figured in. 6) Each planet has to have it's own unique rotation that cannot be like any other. 7) You have to set the parameters of each planets orbit around the sun. speed, distance etc... 8) Factor in an asteroid belt. 9) Factor in comets also. 10) Factor in that some are gas giants and some are just a rock. 11) Some have rings, and that these rings are kept in check by some of the moons that orbit these planets. 12) You have to make all known decaying orbits work. 13) The shrinking sun has to be factored in. Only if you believe that it is shrinking. Now I have restrained this design, that will be made by you, to not include anything that is not part of our solar system. So with all the knowledge you have, construct your system using a formula that you will construct to make all things work. Time limits you have to choose from: a) 6 days. b) 4 billion years. I know that some of you may think this is a joke, but I assure you it is not. Science is based on data gathered and theories that are made from the data. But the data has to support the theory. And to become a scientific theory, it has to have a working mechanism, right? And a working mechanism Theory should have some type of formula. Not just an explanation of what happened, but how, and why it happened. God's word is the only thing that explains how it happened.