Zuiyo-maru carcass.
Here's some pics of some things that came from the water. Things that science nor evolutionist can explain. But the reason I bunch up the pics as I did, was to show how these pics get modified because people want other people to question whether they are real or not. I found most of the modified pics on atheist and evolutionist sites. I found both modified and unmodified on the AIG site. On the pages they wanted to debunk this finding, the modified pics were used. On the page were they were just talking about this thing, and how it compares to some thing else, the pics were in color, and not modified. Why not use the same pics in both places?
Here's where AIG is just talking about the thing and trying to debunk it: http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i3/plesiosaurs.asp
Here's where they are not trying to debunk it: http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v13/i2/sharks.asp
But in either case, they sound not sure whether what is shown is real. This is a you decide case. Because everyone has a different opinion about what it is, or even if it's real.
| Side note: When ever evolutionists cannot explain something that either washes up on shore, or is caught by a fishing boat. Their excuse for what it is will always be a Basking shark. Why? It is the biggest primitive living thing, that has many features of things deemed extinct. So if they can match up one or two features to the basking shark, a basking shark will become it's name regardless of any other evidence. And from that point forward, evolutionists will consider the subject closed and debunked. So here we see an example of a lame excuse to explain away what evolutionist do not want to confront. |
Make sure to click next at the bottom of this page to continue.
