Ron Wyatt.
Page updated: Sunday, March 23, 2008
Here is another person AIG claims is a fraud. Funny thing is, two more people have gone out and confirmed what Ron Wyatt found.
Here's a quote from the Answers in Genesis website:
| There is not the slightest substantiation for Wyatts claims, just excuses to explain away why the evidence is missing. |
Now, even though the word liar of fraud is not used, do you get that it is implied? Of course. It is what they want you to think. Don't see the hidden message? I'll break it down and show it to you.
1) There is not the slightest substantiation for Wyatt's claims = Wyatt is a fraud because he can't own up to what AIG would expect from him.
2) Just excuses to explain away why the evidence is missing = Wyatt is nothing but a liar.
Get the picture?
Note: All pics on this page are copyrighted!!!!!
Moller also found more evidence than Ron Wyatt did. He also had access to more Hi-tech equipment to shoot the under water footage of the artifacts that Ron Wyatt had only claimed (according to AIG) to have found. Moller even went further and found the actual place in Goshen, the land Pharaoh gave to the Israelites for what Joseph had done. Found their dwelling places, and even had a computer predicted enhancement of how these dwelling places would have looked when they were used. But Moller got the same treatment as Wyatt did because the people who more or less killed Wyatt's evidence did not want to admit they lied, and would have to explain it. And AIG agrees with them on this. So here we have another tactic used by atheists and evolutionists that AIG goes along with.
The picture above is the picture Ron Wyatt had taken of the golden chariot wheel believed to be off of Pharaoh's own chariot. AIG seems to think this is faked.
And here is Moller's picture. The reason they look different, and Moller's is better. Moller had a robot camera to do this with, which means he could get much closer to things, and take more pictures than Wyatt was able to. Plus his was not hindered by the fact you only can stay down there so long before you air runs out. With the robot, he could stay down there as long as he wanted. And Moller also went to the other end of the crossing, went into the water and shot pictures as well. Something Wyatt did not do. I have a whole section on Moller pictures, and some of Wyatt's as well. You can see and read about this here.
Here's a quote from the AIG site on Ron Wyatt:
His alleged finds are nothing short of astonishing and include:
- The true site of the crucifixion
- The Ark of the Covenant
- The true Mount Sinai (with a plaque announcing it as such)
- The site of Korah's earthquake
- The true site of the Israelites Red Sea crossing, also with a marker built by King Solomon as a memorial
- Chariot wheels from Pharaohs drowned army
- The actual rock Moses struck to release water
- Noah's Ark (the site discussed here, for which he has been the prime promoter)
- Noah's grave
- Noah's house
- Mrs Noah's grave (containing a fortune in gold and jewelry)
- Moses stone tablets containing the Ten Commandments, held together with golden hinges.
There are more claims like these. Could Ron Wyatt have found and solved problems that have baffled professional archaeologists for more than a century, or is there another explanation? Ron invariably has an explanation of why he can't direct others to see all this hard evidence for themselves at these sites. His occasional seemingly convincing documentation (including video-tape) repeatedly withers under independent scrutiny and/or conflicts with the on-site eyewitness testimony of several of his co-expeditionaries. |
On this web page alone, I just un-debunked four of AIG's claims of debunked evidence. Reference: http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i4/report.asp (note: AIG has redone this page to try and strengthen their stance about all of this here being a lie.)
| We were aware of the rebuttal of the Amazing Ark Exposé article in Creation Magazine, but this is the first time that we have actually seen a copy of it. Consequently, we have not prepared a response to it and wouldnt intend to do so, given that we prefer not to waste valuable time on endless disputations with people who give a pretense of being humble and having integrity. Reference: AIG. |
Does creation magazine have back copies that can be ordered? Creation Magazine article search page. Seems to me AIG could have obtained this article anytime they wanted.
Here's some more links to look into. Notice not once has AIG even went to see such evidence. They are relying on second hand accounts and personal opinions that are based on their dislike towards Ron Wyatt:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v21/i2/ark.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/185.asp (link broken)
On the comment above: To me it looks more like AIG is trying to save face. Being humble, as they claim, also includes being able to admit to being wrong. If I am wrong about this, I have no problem admitting to it. But AIG only has hearsay evidence, and opinions. Things that will not hold up in a court of law against actual video footage from 2 other sources. I am sure that the ones who made both of those videos also have evidence of their actual trip (tickets, visas, etc...). AIG, your integrity is starting to slip. You have "no" hard evidence to disprove, or confirm that what Wyatt did was fraudulent. Now it's coming back to haunt you. I have no problem listing your links that are against what I present here. Why? I think people can make up there own minds about what is true, and what is not. I'm not asking you to leave a link here, but I am asking that you review the videos by the other two sources, and make their evidence available to your website visitors. Giving a one sided view on this looks more like you have an agenda, then trying to show actual truth, or at least let people make up their own minds. Now to continue with subject....
AIG still is relying on what other people say about this. For they have the ability to visit where all this is claimed, but for some reason they have not done so. In a court of law, the accusations presented by AIG would be called hearsay. For when you read what is put on the AIG site about this subject, is there really any shred of evidence that proves fraud? Or just what other people claim? Only that this or that person wrote a book, and this is what it said. Books compared to actual video footage, from three different sources, would not stand a chance in a court of law. AIG, I suggest you get the other two videos that not only confirm most of what Wyatt claimed, but found even more evidence. Links to these videos can be found on the next page.
I want you to also notice how they go after Wyatt like they did Hovind. The wording they choose to use, as they supposedly debunk Wyatt's evidence, they more or less call Wyatt a bald face liar. They even take on Mary Wyatt, and more or less call her the same thing. So what's next, creationist cage matches? In this corner we have Ron and mary Wyatt, and in the other corner we have AIG tag team. Oops, problem is, Wyatt is dead. So I guess they feel great as they bash a Mary's dead husband.
Here's the pic of the robot used to film the footage and take pics.
Here are the two pillars that were raised by King Solomon as a memorial, and the story of the crossing was carved into each one. The Hebrew word for God, Yaweh, is mentioned several times. One pillar was errected from one side, and the other is on the other side. For you can look and tell they are not the same. AIG says Wyatt cannot produce them. Well, here they are.
These photos plus the videos of them, and all the other evidence, has been available for sometime. So if AIG wants to debunk all this, why don't they go to where all this evidence is, instead of relying on second hand opinions about Wyatt? It's because Wyatt found it first, and did not go through AIG peer viewing to get said evidence approved. If seeing is believing. Here it is.
Debunked and faked? I don't think so.
Make sure to click next at the bottom of this page to continue.
