YEC vs. YEC

During the time of the flood, when the canopy fell, the H2O2 water in our oceans had to give off that extra molecule of oxygen that "some" of the water molecules had. like in the pic of the spring as the water flowed by the ladder, because there was not enough barometric pressure to hold it in. Upon doing so, plus the barometric pressure fall. The extra oxygen bonded with any hydrogen and water was formed. With all the extra oxygen, and the right conditions, it was not hard to form as much water as needed to flood the whole earth to the point the bible speaks of.

Barometric pressure being higher makes the atmosphere hold more moisture. So when the canopy fell, the drop in pressure made the atmosphere release the mositure held in it. This is why the weather man on the news is always speaking of high and low pressure systems. Storms cannot form where a high pressure system has formed. This is because the atmosphere is holding the moisture instead of releasing it in the form of rain.

Applying the polar flip to the flood: And if you want to apply the polar flip to this. Which is easier to move, when the poles flip? Liquid, or solid? The stirring of the inner core, from the polar flip, made the core to expand. Thus pushing out the water, thus making the flood. In fact, if the polar flip did happen, it would explain how the crystalline canopy fell. Since it was held together by the magnetic field, the field flip would tear it apart.

The reason the fountains of the deep were broken up is because that extra barometric pressure also held that water under ground. Upon it dropping, when the canopy fell, this water just came gushing out of the ground because the molten core of the earth expanded. Why? The pressure of water in the ground now was greater than the pressure that was holding it in the ground.

Plants played a part in this too. In some areas of the world, vegetation is so thick the plants actually control weather because of all the moisture they can release at any given time as shown in pic above. When the barometric pressure dropped during the fall of the canopy, this enabled these plants to release a lot of moisture to cause huge rain storms. And because the sun could not shine through all this bad weather, the kinetic energy made by the falling rain, and the heat it would cause, was countered by the whole earth being cooled with no sun. When there is no sun, how much kinetic energy would it take to do what the sun does on an everyday bases? The earth can cool an average of 10 plus degrees per day with no sun, so the actual kinetic energy made from all the rain, replaced the heat that would be needed when there was no sun. This same kinetic energy would keep the planet from freezing over, which would have happened for the 40 days we were without the sun.

Averaged over an entire year and the entire Earth, the Sun deposits 342 Watts of energy into every square meter of the Earth*. This is a very large amount of heat 1.7 x 1017 watts of power that the Sun sends to the Earth/atmosphere system. For comparison, a large electric power plant would produce 100 million watts of power, or 108 watts. It would take 1.7 billion such power plants to equal the energy coming to the Earth from the Sun roughly one for every three people on the Earth! Reference: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/Oven/

When the subject of all the rain for the flood is brought up. Evolutionist like to claim that the kinetic energy caused by all that rain would boil the earth. For this to happen, the kinetic energy would have to exceed the production of the same energy of the sun (342 Watts of energy into every square meter of the Earth*). For kinetic energy to even match the sun's out put, on any given day, would be a feat in it self. So for it to even boil the earth, as many will try and claim, it would take a lot more water than what fell in the flood to achieve this.

The other fact is how much water were in the clouds at any given time. A cloud heavy with water will hover closer to the surface of the earth, Which means less travel distance as water falls from the cloud to the flood below. Less distance of travel calculates into less kinetic energy, and also, a reduction of speed. Which happens to be part of the equation for kinetic energy.

Kinetic energy: Energy that a body has as a result of its motion. Mathematically, it is defined as one-half the product of a body's mass and the square of its speed. The form of energy associated with the speed of an object. Its equation is: KE=1/2mv2(squared); or kinetic energy= ? mass x velocity squared.

When the water receded into the earth. We had extra water to get rid of. So as the extra water was taken on by the earth, the earth's crust had to expand to receive it. This expansion caused the land masses to split, and what you see that looks like it was together at one time, was a result of this. It has been found that a mineral deep in the earth holds enough water to fill 30 of our oceans, which is more than enough to flood the earth to the extent the bible speaks of. You can read more about this here.

AIG claims there was rain before the flood, even though God's word says other wise. AIG also claims the impossibility of the canopy, which is just them going along with what science, evolutionist, and atheist claims on such issues. The mainstream science is not always right, but AIG seems to think they are on several things, which are easily explained, when you really look into it. But AIG uses another tactic commonly used by atheist and evolutionist. If you discredit the bearer of evidence you wish to debunk, it is easier than actually debunking the evidence itself. Because once you get people to believe someone is as a big a liar as AIG implies they are, no one will ever believe anything they say. So regardless if evidence is true or not, if the bearer is made out to be not trustable, and that is taken and made a bigger deal of than what it really is. It works just like a gossip magazine. Regardless if it's true or not, some will believe it, and that is all it takes. Which makes me wonder if all that AIG has done was intentional. But when you look at how well the results are, it looks more like a well thought out plan.

In this case, the AIG YEC bashing was done on Carl Baugh. Most of what you see written here came from Carl Baugh. I just modified a few points that I think may have corrected his model. And upon saying this, do you see me bashing Baugh to make my point? Nope. In fact because Baugh was one of the first to really put together a model on this, I will be introducing my ideas about this to him. I don't need to bash someone to make myself famous. And unlike AIG, it's not needed to keep status either. Pride before the fall?

Make sure to click next at the bottom of this page to continue.