YEC vs. YEC

The pattern (square like) of the skin from the back of the dino, matches the pattern on the Ica stone at top of page. Just like the round armor spots discussed on the previous page. Some dinos had armor spots on their sides, and on their backs. How could the carver of this Ica stone know the pattern of the skin, of the back, and side of a dino, unless he saw it? This is just another example of the evolutionist cover up of creation evidence. And a denial of overwhelming evidence that man and dinos did coexist at one time.

Answers in Genesis says the Ica stones are fake. And what you will read on this page: http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v25/i4/bishop.asp#r17 is AIG taking someone Else's word for the truth of this matter. 2 different artifacts of petrified dino skin confirm the Ica stones as being real. So was this a big cover up of more evidence for creation? Yes. Science before God will get you every time. Why? Science is not remotely interested in finding God, or even proving there is one. Why do you think all their theories deny God and what God has claimed through His word? Does AIG think scientist are going to be honest and say: Hey! I found evidence that proves God did create the earth? Every scientist that has done this ends up like Carl Baugh. Mocked, ridiculed, slandered, etc... Evolutionist scientist had no problem with Baugh's education as long as he was on their side. He even appeared on NOVA while he was still an evolutionist. But as soon as he defected from their side, he became a traitor, and was treated just like all evolutionist traitors are. Just put his name into any search engine and see what the evolutionist are saying about him. This is the norm for those who will not conform to their view. And they call us fanatics (fundies).

Side note: There are some fake Ica stones. People will do anything to make a buck. But did science test the Ica stones to see if they were "all" fake? Nope. And there is a reason for that. They only tested the ones they knew were fake to discredit the ones that were not. Remember when I said that it was a common tactic to discredit something, then make a group, and put everything else in that group they want to be fake also? This is just that same tactic being used here. Find a few fakes, confirm they are fake, then say: they are "all" fake. And what if the creationist would apply this same tactic to evolution's evidence? How quick would people start to really question the evolution theory, and it's supporting evidence?

Here are two pictures of fakers of Ica stones that is used all over the net to categorize "all" Ica stones as fake (categorizing fakes and non-fakes). Who's to say that both of these people were not actually paid to pose in the pics, and paid to say what they have said?

Some questions to make you think:

1) If these Ica stones did not have dinos, and man coexisting, would evolutionists have gone to all the trouble to make sure they are preconceived as fake?

2) Why would someone even draw pics of dinos and man coexisting like this, when the main view accepted is that it did not happen?

3) How could the carver know that dinos had skin armor on their sides, and back? And be able to draw them almost to an exact? Unless he saw them (the fakers were just copying what was already drawn on the originals)?

4) Why would these two people go on t.v. to admit to faking, and frauding merchandise? Is that very good for business? I don't think so. Might even get you in trouble.

5) Why did scientists only test the stones they knew were fake, that they got from the Ica fakers pictured above? Because they knew what the out come would be. Or they could pass it all off as fake, the out come more is easier this way.

How many people reading this right now feel you have been duped by evolutionists on these issues? And if they will go this far to deny what you see here, how much further have they gone to present fake evidence of their own to try and prove the unprovable? They have been caught a few times, but what about all the evidence that's out there that maybe just as fake, and no body has caught it yet? Evidence that been taught to our children on an everyday bases in our schools. When we send our kids to college to learn science etc... Is there a class that's named: Science 101-How to lie, and deceive people into believing scientific evidence that can't be proven, and how to destroy evidence that contradicts it? You would think so as experts as they are at doing this.

New information has come my way. Peru has a law that prohibits the sell of what it considers:  historical treasures of their country. In fact, the jail time someone can be sentenced to for this is like a death sentence. Because jails are so bad, most die there within 2 years from diseases etc... The reason Peru is so strict on this is because of the constant looting of their historical artifacts. You can read about some of that here: http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/peruvian-artifacts.htm . So when the men above did the t.v. interview, they would have been bound by law to say what they did about those artifacts (they were fake). To admit to selling them as being real, would have meant their death in jail. So with only one answer to give in your interviews on t.v. that meant you would live, which answer would you give? So here we have information held back from the public, so that the public can be deceived even further.

Here are some more links of looting examples:

http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/41/198.html

When are evolutionists going to learn that with every lie that is exposed, because they lie on purpose, it only strengthens our case, and weakens theirs.

To sum it up:

The pattern on the actual petrafied Dinosaur skin matches the ica stone.

The pattern on the actual petrafied skin from a Dinosaur's back, matches the ica stone.

Considering that man and Dinosaurs never lived together (according to evolutionists). How could the ica stone carvers know what the Dinosaur skins looked like? Each ica stone carving was made before actual evidence of the skin designs were even found. Things that make you go Hmm.

Make sure to click next at the bottom of this page to continue.