|
Some have ask me: What is your goal by going after Answers in Genesis like this?
1) To stop them from making their debunk about creationists not sound so bad, and so final.
People make mistakes. Also, people are entitled to different opinions. The way AIG goes about doing what they do, it's like you cannot be in this subject unless you think like they do. AIG's thinks their reality should be your reality, which is a form of relativism. Which is a humanistic view. If a person is not allowed to think out of the box of the norm for creation, how are we supposed to find answers? It's like if a creationist strays off the guided path of info, that AIG provides, you've become some type liar and fraud. AIG never comes out and uses those exact words, but there are several ways to imply what they mean without actually saying it. God is the only person who can determine absolute truth. Therefore God is the only person that absolutely knows when someone is lying or has been deceived. And to do this, you have to have all knowledge of all things. Does AIG have this? Does science have this? So AIG uses science to imply someone is lying about creation, when they cannot even prove, that what they claim, is truth to the standards of the Creator? |
2) To stop them from making debunked creation evidence be so final.
AIG not only debunks the evidence they say is not right, but they go after the bearer of this evidence as well. This is a well known evolutionist tactic. It is easier to discredit the bearer, then all his evidence becomes debunked automatically. How? He becomes a liar from that point forward, in the eyes of all who read what AIG implies about them. Any new evidence is not accepted, or even looked at. So said debunked info does not have a chance to become un-debunked. And if it did, it becomes a long drawn out process that most people would give up on. Because the process seems like a never ending fight, all just to prove a point, on new evidence no one wants to even look at.
The problem with this method is that it controls the path in which truth is based upon. And the person, or people who control this path, also control preconceived truth about creation to a point. Creation is not AIG's creation, nor is it science's creation. It is God's creation. Because when people trust what is being claimed by the same people, they will also trust the direction the same "said people" will guide them. Whether what they find is more provable then what is claimed to be debunked. It would not matter. Because people are putting their trust in man, through a man-made organization that determines truth about creation. When our trust is supposed to be based in God. And to do this, a organization always has to give credit to the Creator. And never deny or dictate the power of the creator to create through man-made ideas, or physical laws that were created for us, and not God.
Having the power to control truth gives man a sense of God-ship. And this God-ship can go un-noticed because it has many ways to hide itself. And there are fields of science that also give God-ship attitude to those who are easily drawn to such a power. Like a heart surgeon. Every time he does his work, he holds life and death in his hands. This can give this person a God like complex because he is doing something most people cannot even comprehend. And people live and die based on his expertise of his job. And if he becomes really good at it, and is able to save those which usually die. How much further can he be drawn into this God-ship thinking, and not even realize it? Has AIG been lured into God-ship thinking without realizing it? |
3) AIG has put the methods of science in front of the ways of God.
If something is not scientifically explainable, then it becomes non-doable, according to a lot of what AIG says. Though AIG will try and stick to their 6 day creation, even though science disagrees. On other issues, they apply the complete scientific method. Doing this denies the power of God in creation. How? Because it defines the power of God through a man-made method. Man cannot define God, or His abilities. Now some may say: Your going into the God did it area. And that would be true. But science also has a God did it like phrase called "natural selection".
So how come 6 day creation becomes a God did it term, and is the bases AIG uses for it's ministry. But everything else AIG does, becomes a conformity to man-made methods? Are we supposed to conform to God, or man? For if we apply more of God to His creation, how much more of God will we find? And if we apply man-made methods, how much of God will we find through man? |
| 4) To stop the separating power AIG has embarked on.
Because science is based on man-made methods, there will always be a conflict between creationists on the subject of God's creation. And science will always be the bases in which this will happen. Because scientific physical laws is determine by what man observes, will always be an issue of how God will be preconceived in His ability to create. I have yet to see anyone come up with verses from the Creator's book that can define the power of God in His creation. So if the book does not tell us, where do we get the notion we can do this through man-made methods? Is God defined by the physical laws that He has assigned to us, or does God live outside the laws in a realm called eternity? Which denies one of the very base foundations for our physical existence which happens to be "time". If time were removed from our realm, how much of science would discontinue to work? How many theories, and formulas, would lose the base foundation and would no longer make sense? So from this we can determine that: time=law. Which means the phrase: "In the beginning (time)"... Was God laying out the law that would control the bases in how our physical realm would work, and how we would understand it.
This is the very reason God's creation does not make sense to science. You cannot explain the power of God through methods of time where time does not control the being who created it. This is also why the six day creation will always conflict with science, because the eternal creator used His eternal method and power (one we do not understand), to create all that we see. Scientific method is based on time, and all the calculation done with the use of time. God's creation is done through eternity, a place where either time does not exist, or has no meaning, and does not control things there, like it controls things here. In my opinion, I don't think time even exists in eternity, because time requires a beginning. And God says: He always was. In fact, time is the very reason God's word starts out: In the beginning. There was no beginning before time. What was has always been, and will always be.
Side note: This subject has already started a separation on my end. Has caused people to have to take sides. Sides to where each person has to make a decision on "who" they will stick by, and 'who" they will separate from. Some people may blame me for what is happening. I only exposed what was already happening by bringing it to the light. Sin that gets to hide in the dark continues to have it's destroying power. Those who see it, when it's brought to light, and want it to continue. Makes the exposed sin more powerful by being able to work in both light, and darkness. Allowing a known sin to continue, when it has been exposed, is committing what is called wilfull sin. This is also allowing the sins of another to become your own.
heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins. |
|
5) My main Goal....
To put God back on top for the bases of creation. To remove science as the dictator to all that creation is, and all that God can do. God is God, and it is time we realize that science cannot explain all these things about Him, anymore than those who follow him. And science is not who we need to answer to when explaining how God created. Because when we stand before God, do you actually think, God will judge us from scientific formulas, theories and physical laws? So why are we depending on a method that guides us into a direction that is opposite of what God is? A method that was put together, and is now run by those who hate God, and despise all who follow Him. One that tries to control our thoughts by telling us how stupid we are (which is where AIG is now at. Your a stupid creationist if you do not conform to our way of scientifically finding our preconceived method of truth). Where do you think AIG learned to do this to other creationists from? Is this method of destroying others, implying them to be as liars, and trying to make everyone conform to another person's view of truth, found in God's word? You deal with that which is not Godly. And the bases of what it really is, will rub off on you (science over God).
Example: You cannot claim to be child of God, and say it is ok to read Harry Potter. For what it promotes becomes your representation of what God is. And when God is mocked in such a manner, there is a curse that can be put upon those who choose to do this. Those who refuse to retain the knowledge of God, after receiving the knowledge of truth, and choose to believe a lie. God gave them up to be reprobates. Not knowing the difference between right or wrong.
Now, I did not say AIG uses witchcraft, or that they are reprobates. But by using that example, some will gather that is what was meant. I leave this as an example to all about how things can be used to imply something without actually saying it. And how some people will pick up on this, and then spread it for what was implied, but not really said. So does the implying of lying, and being frauds, by AIG. Meant to do what it has done, then Talk Origins, plus other evolutionists sites, just pick up where AIG left off? It's not that hard to make someone believe a certain way, then have them look at someone who implies the same exact thing and say: See, they thing the same way we do about said person, or said evidence. |
Note: AIG has changed some of it's wording for the introduction to the page where they try and debunk YEC evidence. So maybe they will change how they approach this issue so I can take the AIG part of this section down. And just leave the evidence for people to make their own decisions about. So regardless of what some may think about what I did in this section, and how I approached it. My main goal was to stop the strife, and attacks on other creationist just because they have different opinions from AIG. So when they realize that difference of opinion about creation should be allowed. And that their wording should not always imply that someone is lying, in a round about way. Then this section about AIG will disappear.
Make sure to click the next button at the bottom of each page to continue. This section is several pages long, and has several pics and links as evidence.
